Skip to content

MHRA GxP data integrity guidance, for IT

What the MHRA's GxP data integrity guidance expects of computerised systems and the people who run them, and how to show it at inspection.

One guidance for all of GxP

The MHRA published its 'GXP' Data Integrity Guidance and Definitions (revision 1) in March 2018. It applies across GMP, GCP, GLP, GDP and pharmacovigilance and explains how the MHRA reads the existing requirements for data. Its starting point: the organisation takes responsibility for its systems and the data they generate, under a data governance policy endorsed at the highest level, with effort proportionate to the risk.

What it asks of IT

Much of it concerns how systems are configured, accessed and kept.

  • Systems designed for data integrity: synchronised clocks, access rights that prevent unauthorised changes, interfaces that avoid manual transcription
  • Audit trails switched on where the risk assessment requires them, not changeable by users, and reviewed as part of routine data review
  • Individual accounts, no shared logins where the system supports individual ones, and system administrator access limited to as few people as possible, none of them with an interest in the data
  • Validated transfer and migration, true copies that keep content, context, metadata and audit trail, and archiving before a system is decommissioned
  • Backup and recovery validated, each backup verified, restores tested periodically
  • Cloud and virtual services understood: data ownership, location, retrieval, retention and security set out in the contract

Legacy systems

Systems without an audit trail or individual accounts need effective alternative controls and documented, timely progress towards a compliant solution. The guidance says plainly that missing remediation may be cited as a deficiency.

With the GxP Validation Assistant

How the assistant helps

  • The guidance as a rule pack

    Each expectation paraphrased with its section, labelled guidance, cited by the SOPs and the self-assessment.

  • Access as a process

    Joiners, movers and leavers, privileged and service accounts, and access reviews per system, with records and due dates.

  • Audit trail reviews

    Reviews recorded with what was looked at and what was found, and the next one on the Today page.

  • Backups with evidence

    Backup evidence, restore tests and DR tests recorded per system, with reports.

Rule texts are summaries in the product's own words with their sections; the MHRA publishes the guidance itself. The assistant supports your data integrity programme; it does not replace it.

See it with your own systems.

Watch the webinar, or install the assistant and try it for 14 days.